tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post849807411828398355..comments2024-03-26T13:45:53.127+01:00Comments on The Oscar Nerd: The Final Conclusion - Best Actress 1990dinasztiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17418227830861757663noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post-10381595105188014952014-02-22T08:54:34.548+01:002014-02-22T08:54:34.548+01:00Since you picked Laura Dern for this year, have yo...Since you picked Laura Dern for this year, have you seen her Oscar-nominated turn on Rambling Rose? I thought she was really good there.Darionoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post-89159033426022947842011-04-24T20:45:49.566+02:002011-04-24T20:45:49.566+02:00Great that Kathy won and that you acknowledge Glen...Great that Kathy won and that you acknowledge Glenn Close who was perfect and brilliant in Reversal of Fortune!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post-15587692789064005182010-12-04T10:26:47.431+01:002010-12-04T10:26:47.431+01:00hi,isn't glenn supporting in rof and lead in h...hi,isn't glenn supporting in rof and lead in hamlet for 1990.mrripleynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post-51102700418658383552010-11-24T18:35:20.824+01:002010-11-24T18:35:20.824+01:00Kathy was a sure thing! :-)Kathy was a sure thing! :-)Fritzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291268052797806635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post-72946672723588377372010-11-24T07:33:24.753+01:002010-11-24T07:33:24.753+01:00Joe: I was considering giving her the win, but Kat...Joe: I was considering giving her the win, but Kathy was obvious after all. 1966 is probably next :), unless a 1986 fanclub starts voting today crazily.dinasztiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17418227830861757663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post-74699376913162439922010-11-24T00:43:55.394+01:002010-11-24T00:43:55.394+01:00I thought Meryl would win...;...
Hm, I'll s...I thought Meryl would win...;... <br /><br /><br />Hm, I'll say 1966 is next?joe burnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01987519630654592530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post-58227749296310849682010-11-23T21:24:00.634+01:002010-11-23T21:24:00.634+01:00Not a surprising year, since Bates is a good winne...Not a surprising year, since Bates is a good winner.Louis Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07933180959140340196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14626381454085139.post-30597678463404455332010-11-23T21:12:26.971+01:002010-11-23T21:12:26.971+01:00No surprise here - and I agree about Joanne, there...No surprise here - and I agree about Joanne, there's nothing interesting about it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com