Showing posts with label Emma Thompson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emma Thompson. Show all posts

Thursday, January 2, 2014

The Next Year

1993


So the nominees were:

  • Angela Bassett in What's Love Got to Do with It
  • Stockard Channing in Six Degrees of Separation
  • Holly Hunter in The Piano
  • Emma Thompson in Remains of the Day
  • Debra Winger in Shadowlands
One of the most interesting years of the 1990s, for sure. Will I fall under the pre-voodoo queen spell of Angela Bassett? Will my love for Emma Thompson carry her to the big win? Am I going to join the Holly Hunter fans? Or will I pick one of the other two exceptional ladies?

What do you think? (I'll get back to 1999, but I don't feel like it right now). :) 

Saturday, March 17, 2012

The Final Conclusion - Best Actress 1995

1995

 

So the much anticipated ranking is:

I was quite impressed by Emma Thompson's work and I feel she richly deserved the Oscar - for writing. Her contributions to the movie as a screenwriter are much significant than what she gave here as an actress. However, it would be clearly unfair from me not to emphasise how much I liked her acting as well and how connected I felt to her character. She didn't get the showiest part, that's for sure, but her talent shines even with such circumstances. 

I don't see the brilliance that many others do but I see the effort and can completely understand why many people are in love with this work. Although she definitely makes Francesca an extremely realistic woman that you can easily relate to, it's just something that wasn't too hard for the marvelous Meryl Streep. Nevertheless, I cannot deny the fact that she really elevates her movie that would just dragging along without her.  

I can conclude that Susan Sarandon gives a fantastic performance as Helen Prejean. She hits all the right notes, she displays dignity, grace and faith like nobody else. Her subtle, emotional work stays with you long after movie and is actually the most important reason to see the film. Although this part may not have been too difficult to play for an actress of Susan's calibre, it's still outstanding, brave and gutwrenching work given by a wonderful actress.

Sharon Stone gives a brutal, chaotic and disturbing performance as Ginger in Casino. She gets rid of all her vanity, glamour and sexiness in the process of creating a living piece of junk. Although the downfall of this woman is very hard to watch, Sharon makes it a wonderful experience, thanks to her wonderful talent, her intelligence and confidence. Excellent work.

What an easy call! Elisabeth Shue kills the rest of her competition with her brilliant performance that I consider one of the greatest ones ever given. If you surrender to her, it's going to be a wonderful experience for you. She makes Sera such an interesting, heartbreaking character without seeming forced for a second. It all seems to come from her so naturally: she clearly identified with this character.

 So I can proudly announce
that the winner is...
Elisabeth Shue 
in 
Leaving Las Vegas
 

Don't worry Elisabeth! You got the important one! :) 

Final thoughts: Wow, a very strong year. I've had better but it was still a treat. Elisabeth was an easy winner, the rest of the ranking, however, took some time to decide. How weird: I drew the order of the reviews, which eventually turned out to be my ranking. So strange. :) In the end, I'm quite confident about this ranking. I'm kind of disappointed that Meryl didn't win three in a row (OK, I admit that I wanted it to happen...badly) and you, of course, didn't expect it not to happen plus I think Sharon's #2 ranking is also a shocker to you. I guess I prefer prostitutes to nuns and hopeless lovers. :) It was really Elisabeth's time to shine and I hope she will one day get on the podium as an Oscar winner. Anyway, I'm glad Susan Sarandon has an Oscar. 

Omissions:
  • Kathy Bates in Dolores Claibourne
  • Julianne Moore in Safe

The next year: 
  • Intriguing, eating babies, befriending animals... :-) 
What do you think? Any thoughts on your mind?

Bad news: I'm going to really slow down. I've had some free time now, but it's only gonna be worse until 18th June. After that, however... I'm going to catch up. :) I have to focus on my studies now. :) I'm not giving this up, don't worry, I don't have writer's block, I'm full of creative energy, I just don't have time.
"IT'S JUST TILL JUNE!"

Emma Thompson in Sense and Sensibility

Emma Thompson received another (her third) Oscar nomination for playing another woman destined to become a spinster, this time in the adaptation of Jane Austen's novel, Sense and Sensibility. Emma's chances of winning are the hardest to speculate about. She was a sure thing in Best Adapted Screenplay but in Best Actress, I suppose nobody had a chance of winning. People decided to vote for Emma in Adapted Screenplay, therefore I don't think they picked her in Actress. However, the fact that Emma's movie was the only Best Picture contender might have given her the edge over Meryl.

Although Sense and Sensibility is not the best movie ever made (not even the best from that year), it's so beautifully made in every possible way. First of all, it had a wonderful, flawless adaptation for which Emma Thompson much deservedly won the Oscar: it's so full of subtle emotions and humor, the dialogues, the scenes are so brilliantly written that it's extremely hard to believe that it was Emma's first time as a screenwriter for a feature film. Moreover, Ang Lee's direction is just as excellent and it was robbed of the nomination (his movies are so underrated by the Academy in terms of wins). And I haven't even mentioned the wonderful technical part and the excellent performances (including Wonder Woman Winslet who deserved an Oscar for this work of hers).

I don't know if I have told you this but I so love everything about Emma Thompson: her subtle acting style, her wonderful, terrific, killer sense of humor (her Golden Globe speech for this movie is the best I've ever heard, no contest). Although her performances may not cover a truly wide range, I always enjoy them and I feel sympathy for the characters she plays wheter they be depressed writers, depressed and/or hopeless spinsters or the angel of America. 

Elinor Dashwood is the spinster of the Dashwood family. She's composed, responsible, kind and extremely repressed. She's typically the one who suffers because of the others but has to keep a straight face for the sake of them. It's important to notice this time that Emma also served as a screewriter in this film since it truly influenced the way this woman was portrayed. Most actors writing their parts always write the most most spectacular and showy roles for themselves (if they play the lead), however, Emma (very much like Great Glenn in Albert Nobbs) cared about remaining faithful to the concept of the character instead of writing herself a true showcase as an actress. For this, I'll forever admire her but in the end, this loyalty is the thing that prevents her from giving a truly knockout performance. 

Not that I'm implying that Emma is not great in this movie - she is indeed great in every possible way. She's doing her usual stuff and uses the same tricks all over again and yet her work remains just as fresh and impressive as her previous efforts. Moreover, despite being quite an unshowy part, Elinor Dashwood is far and away the most interesting character for me from the movie. In the stories with three sisters, it's always the oldest sister, the "spinster" whose fate truly captivates me: we can mention Diane Keaton's Lenny from Crimes of the Heart or Chekhov's heroine Olga from Three Sisters (Hannah and her Sisters is the odd one out, I guess, never you mind LOL). Although that extremely tragic edge of those characters is not emphasised by Emma as much as I would like it, she still wonderfully shows this aspect of Elinor. 

I was impressed by the way Emma portrayed Elinor's dignity and how she showed her in the scenes with the girl, Lucy who's secretly engaged to Elinor's true love. I really wish that Elinor had just bitch-slapped the girl (though this is not a soap from the 1980s, it's a soap romantic story from the Victorian era) but Emma wonderfully suggests that it's not Elinor's style. 

Hugh Grants's Edward is quite probably the lamest, clumsiest and most boring guy that's ever been fallen in love with in any story but Emma makes us understand why Elinor fell for her so much. Their chemistry (or is it more proper to say lack of chemistry in the case of these two characters?) is just excellent. I'm not suggesting that their tempestuous love affair sets the screen on fire but they look just fine together. 

With such a character, you would expect to see her break out of her shell and even though that doesn't happen here in a traditional sense, I can see the development in Elinor. She gradually learns how to care more about herself and be little bit more selfish, while she also remains loyal to her old life. Her most memorable scene (for me) came when she was taking care of her ill sister and was crying by the bed. That scene was as moving as it gets and I give nothing but praise for it.

But there are points when her emotions come to the surface and even then, Emma is able to remain as subtle as she was previously. Although we get an insight to Elinor's pain, suffering and bitterness, I wish Emma had done a little bit more. I approve of subtlety but Emma could have moved one step forward to being even more emotional and yet remaining just as subtle. That one step, which cleary would have made her truly amazing here, was clearly missing from this performance eventually and I couldn't help feeling bitter in the end. 

Still, I was quite impressed by Emma Thompson's work and I feel she richly deserved the Oscar - for writing. Her contributions to the movie as a screenwriter are much significant than what she gave here as an actress. However, it would be clearly unfair from me not to emphasise how much I liked her acting as well and how connected I felt to her character. She didn't get the showiest part, that's for sure, but her talent shines even with such circumstances. She's moving and effective without a doubt and for this she gets
 

What do you think? Stay tuned for The Final Conclusion (which won't be that much of a nailbiter, I'm sure). 

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

The Next Year

1995


So the nominees were:

  • Susan Sarandon in Dead Man Walking
  • Elisabeth Shue in Leaving Las Vegas
  • Sharon Stone in Casino
  • Meryl Streep in The Bridges of Madison County
  • Emma Thompson in Sense and Sensibiliy
Thank God this year has become very timely, thanks to the well-deserved and very much anticipated third win of Meryl. :) Can you think of celebrating in a better way? She might even become my first four-time winner and the only one to gain three wins in a row (I will be completely impartial, don't worry)!

What do you think? Who's your pick? What's your prediction for my ranking? :) 

Friday, July 29, 2011

The Final Conclusion - Best Actress 1992

1992


So the much anticipated ranking is:

I'm a bit clueless about how I felt about this performance. I mean, I really liked it and it was surely very entertaining as I was watching it but it was not something that really blew my socks off. Michelle is very good as Lurene, making her a very likeable person despite the fact that we shouldn't really like her. I appreciate the effort, it just didn't blow me away. But there's something about her that makes me really like her.
Just like her whole performance, as Susan Sarandon is really memorable and moving as Michaela Odone, a woman who refuses to give up on her son's life. Although she's nothing truly mindblowing, she works extremely well with the characters and shows her emotions exceptionally. Really great work.

Sorry haters, I'm not one of you as I was totally taken by Catherine Deneuve's wonderful performance in Indochine. Catherine put on an incredibly subtle but extremely haunting performance that is unforgettable for me. She got everything right and despite the screentime issues she really amazed me.

Although Margaret Schlegel is a sort of unspectacular character, the performance of Emma Thompson in Howards End is nothing short of spectacular. Despite the little bit slow beginning, I found this work of hers fantastic and I was totally taken by her. It's a true testament to her greatness that the performance is still growing on me and I think so much about it.

This is a wonderful performance that I loved from the beginning to the end. Although it's not a mindblowing piece of work, it's still exceptional and should be much more often talked about. Mary McDonnell created a very memorable and much more layered character than one would expect. She excellently shows this character's pain plus she's a real treat to watch.

So I can proudly announce
the winner is...
Mary McDonnell
in
Passion Fish
This one was very close.

Final thoughts: This year was way better than I expected. Surprising outcome, even for me. I thought Emma would be a shoo-in (and I thought only Catherine could upset). Although none of these performances was an amazing achievement, they were all impressive. Ranking the Deneuve-McDonnell-Sarandon-Thompson qurtett was incredibly difficult. Then it came down to Catherine vs. Mary and it was even harder. I really did not know how to decide but I hope I made the right decision. In the end, I went with Mary's adorably bitchy and heartbreaking performance as the daytime actress. Somehow she stayed in my mind the longest. Michelle was really good though I found her a bit lacking, many are criticising Catherine in Indochine but I loved her. The other ladies were all wonderful.

Omissions:

  • Whoopi Goldberg in Sister Act 
  • Michelle Pfeiffer in Batman Returns
  • Tilda Swinton in Orlando
  • Alfre Woodard in Passion Fish  *My Pick*
About the next year: It's no secret that it will be 1962. :)

What do you think?

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Emma Thompson in Howards End

Emma Thompson received her first Academy Award for playing Margaret Schlegel, the heroine of E.M. Forster's in the Best Picture nominated adaptation of the novel Howards End. Right now, it seems to be that Emma Thompson's win was pretty locked, which is surprising for many reasons. Of course, the Academy has always had a thing for the British but it's still surprising that they gave her the win for a low-key performance over superstars like Michelle Pfeiffer. Emma Thompson's win is one of the most original picks by the Academy as they really seemed to be voting for the performance that they considered the best.

What a movie! I didn't use to be one of the major fans of Howards End but that might just change now. When I saw the DVD, I was hesitant to buy it but boy now I'm so glad that I did. This is such a beautiful, wonderful, fantastic, spectacular, gripping, excting, romantic and unforgettable film. Although I'm not much of a fan of the Ivory-Merchant duo, I was totally taken by this one. I'd say all the nominations were worthy the wins for Adapted Screenplay and Art Direction were richly deserved and I would have given it the win for Picture, Cinematography and Score. Vanessa Redgrave was very good in this role but hers was probably the only nomination that I wouldn't give out immediately.

Emma Thompson is an excellent actress, in my humble opinion, with a brilliant sense of humor. Her subtle and/or witty acting style always impresses me. She has a wonderful presence on the screen and she always becomes so magnetic despite the fact that her roles are mostly silent and she plays them in a very subtle way. I can see why some don't like her that much. She doesn't have huge breakdowns with tons of tears, she's not tearing her hear and such things. Her type of acting is very delicate, subtle and it contains so much underlying beauty.

In Howards End, Emma Thompson play Margaret Schlegel, a very intelligent woman who's destined to become a spinster but her life turns upside down when her good friend dies and her late husband offers Margaret to marry her. At the beginning of the film, we see the intelligence and the kindness of Margaret shining through the screen and Emma shows it just like she had to. Although in the beginning she's a bit weaker compared to the rest of her performance, she still does a great job at portraying the traits of Margaret. Her scenes with Vanessa Redgrave are excellent and it's wonderful to see two such great actresses together on the screen. I especially loved the Christmas shopping which turned out to be one of the best scenes in the movie.

Another interesting thing that I noticed is that Thompson portrayed Margaret as a woman who plays the role of the mother with her siblings. She's pampering them, conforting them and always tries to do the best for them. The self-sacrificing side of hers is excellently shown by Emma and it resulted in many really moving scenes.

Some are quite critical of Anthony Hopkins' performance as Henry Wilcox, Margaret's husband but I didn't notice the mistakes in his acting while he played with Emma. They really seemed to be enjoying working together and the result of their cooperation speak for themselves. I loved the quiet tension in the scenes where they were arguing with each other. Their big confrontation towards the end is excellently handled by both of them (I loved the way Emma Thompson's neck was twitching when Hopkins shouted at her).

However, Emma does wonders with the roles when also when she's alone and there's nobody else. She has no huge breakdowns but there's one scene where she cries in front of a mirror. A very short, underplayed sequence that had such huge effect on me that I really cannot forget it. It's probably one of the best subtly acted scenes in history. Emma avoids the trap of making this a very huge, loud scene as it really wouldn't fit the character.

Although Margaret Schlegel is a sort of unspectacular character, the performance of Emma Thompson in Howards End is nothing short of spectacular. Despite the little bit slow beginning, I found this work of hers fantastic and I was totally taken by her. It's a true testament to her greatness that the performance is still growing on me and I think so much about it. Excellent job, which gets an extremely strong

It was almost a 5 but I just compared her to some of the ladies and 4,5 seemed to be the most fair grade.

What do you think?

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

The Next Year

1992


So the nominees were:
  • Catherine Deneuve in Indochine
  • Mary McDonnell in Passion Fish
  • Michelle Pfeiffer in Love Field
  • Susan Sarandon in Lorenzo's Oil
  • Emma Thompson in Howards End
This one is said to be a weak year but to me all fields are interesting, so let's see how these great ladies will do.

What do you think? What's your ranking? What's your prediction for my ranking?